Talk:Amy Barrett Supreme Court nomination

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination

Law

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

United States courts and judges

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles

Women

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Just reports

From what i've seen right now its just anonymous sources saying that she's the pick, but shouldnt this article wait until there is real confirmation by the president later on saturday?

From the NYT reference article "“I haven’t said it was her, but she is outstanding,” Mr. Trump told reporters who asked about Judge Barrett’s imminent nomination at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington after CNN and other news outlets reported on his choice." Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 01:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The selection has been reported by reliable sources (NYT, Axios, WaPo, NPR, AP News, Barron's, Atlantic). KidAd talk 01:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But Trump has not officialy nominated anyone, it's just anonymous sources saying this, even if it's true this article should wait until there's an actual official announcement. Even the title of the article is technically wrong, it's not a nomination until someone is nominated Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 01:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Lochglasgowstrathyre; the press reports say that Trump intends to nominate Judge Barrett, and he hasn't officially nominated her - and if an outlet says that Trump has already nominated someone, that's not accurate. Until then, the existence of this article doesn't make sense. For all we know, he might nominate someone else, though I have my doubts about that possibility. Once he nominates someone, I'm sure the articles in question would be revised as appropriate. Andrew11374265 (talk) 07:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need a separate article on this? Is the coverage on Amy Coney Barrett not adequate?--Ipigott (talk) 11:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2020 United States Supreme Court vacancy which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]