Talk:Amuda

Kurdistan Mid‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

www.amouda.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.139.59.57 (talk) 15:00, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

Removing sourced material

Stam and BGM, you are removing sourced material and POV. Could you explain? Otherwise, I would have to revert. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 21:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The matter at hand, at least for me, is that you removed sourced material. As I explained in my edit summary, your edit served only to make the Kurds' guilt more clear - even though it already was very clear - and remove various interesting, sourced little details of history. Stamboliyski (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least, that is how I interpreted your edit at the time. Feel free to correct me if I overlooked something! Stamboliyski (talk) 06:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What material did I remove? I only added material and a new source. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wording check, please

The wording sounds partially "funny". I'm not a native speaker, though - perhaps someone can else have a look? Havlicek stole the ball (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amuda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417082428/http://www.americanmesopotamian.org/uploads/66603/A_brief_history_of_the_plight_of_the_Christian_Assyrians_in_modern_day_Iraq.pdf to http://www.americanmesopotamian.org/uploads/66603/A_brief_history_of_the_plight_of_the_Christian_Assyrians_in_modern_day_Iraq.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amude change title

From article: "95% of the inhabitants in the town are Kurds" so if this is true it would mean the vast majority of people who live in the city call it Amude, not Amuda. Therefore it seems a good idea to move the article to the Kurdish translation. Thoughts? I don't see any justification for it remaining its Arabic title. Des Vallee (talk) 07:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not how WP works. The common name is still Amuda. Otherwise, we would have moved Prague to Praha, and so forth. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 04:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]