Jump to content

Talk:Amsterdam sex crimes case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Public reaction

[edit]

Is it possible to add any information has to how the case is being presented in the media and what the public reaction has been? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Djflem (talk • contribs)

That would be useful indeed, I will add something about that... L.tak (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to hear the public was outraged, they should be. Molesting dozens of kids, and a 19-day old baby...it doesn't get any more sickening than that. PumpkinSky talk 21:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tense

[edit]

Now that the trial is over the article should be written in past tense, ie, the trail took place, was heard. etc. Can you give it a try? and if need be will make corrections. Then we can proceed with DYK nom Djflem (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done! The only place where I kept the present tense is in the first sentence of the lede: it still is a court case as long as not judgement has been given IMO... L.tak (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Amsterdam sex crimes case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amsterdam sex crimes case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amsterdam_sex_crimes_case&oldid=1204825463"