Jump to content

Talk:Amrum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment

[edit]

Please add references! This article has none, that is the reason why even I think it's only start class. Some English refs and this thing is C, enough refs and here is a B article. Minor issues are, the too short intro, the history section first or directly after the geography and there is no climate section. Nevertheless, very good work. Sebastian scha. (talk) 03:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the problem, apparently there's no English literature whatsoever readily available! Maybe there are some scholarly papers somewhere around, but on a first glimpse, all relevant sources are written in German. But well, that's better than nothing. I'll keep searching for English sources though. De728631 (talk) 12:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Add German sources, they are better than nothing. You don't know how many readers might speak German. Sebastian scha. (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, we've got a mix of German and English sources now, seven in total. I think that's quite good. I also expanded the introduction. De728631 (talk) 16:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's nice. New class C. But there is a new problem triva sections are frowned, maybe it is possible to rename it in media and expand it a little, is there a newspaper? Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! I added the paper, but I think you might also want to change the "importance" scale now ;) And there's a map too. De728631 (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Huh. The importance scale is a can of worms for me, but you are right Amrum is clearly medium important. The map comment is blanked? This article is not in the category map needed, but I deleted the option now ,-) Sorry, my English is to bad for checking for grammar mistakes and for B there should be more refs, (e.g.) especially the population need a source (My style is: the more the merrier). Sebastian scha. (talk) 17:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had already removed the map tag before. Anyway, my work here is done for a while, off to Föhr I move. De728631 (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amrum&oldid=1204823654"