Talk:Amory Street station

Amory Street station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 22, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 7, 2022.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Amory Street station and Babcock Street station replaced four predecessor stations?

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amory Street station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Greater Boston Public Transit Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts / Boston Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Stations / Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that Amory Street station and Babcock Street station replaced four predecessor stations? Source: Comm. Ave. Green Line Improvements Public Meeting (This more recent source, cited later in the article, also supports the hook and specifically names the new stations.)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Epidural blood patch

Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: Both articles reached GA status within a week, long enough, neutral and no copyvio obvious. Several sources are behind paywalls or offline, and are accepted AGF. The hook is interesting and referenced. All pictures are free. You'll need to do one more QPQ since you are nominating two articles at once. Corachow (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Corachow: I wasn't sure if that was still the case - it isn't in the QPQ instructions - but I also reviewed Abraham Wolf. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Per WP:DYKSG#H4, I think you need QPQs for each article you're nominating. Thanks for providing another QPQ. Corachow (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P3