Talk:Amoria (gastropod)

Gastropods Mid‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Move request

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was oppose now that page Amoria is now a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amoria (gastropod) → Amoria — --Snek01 (talk) 19:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support I have no idea why a Korean product is the target of the redirect. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Indifferent. Note that Amoria is now a disambiguation page, although the gastropod is the only actual article with the same title. older ≠ wiser 00:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Page Amoria is now a disambig of 6 choices. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.