Talk:Amita Ramanujan

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Deleted the following:

I felt this was an unfair characterization of how the character was received since it was based on one single reviewer from the Imagine Games Network. Unless the author can provide more evidence that she was "annoying" it's pretty harsh on a character that some people like.... DELETED: The character of Amita Ramanuajan has received a mixed reception. Brian Zoromski, a reviewer at IGN.com, said that, until the episode “Angels and Devils”, Amita did not feel like a well-rounded character and that Rawat appeared “annoying”.^[1]

References

^ Brian Zoromski (May 18, 2009). "Numb3rs: Angels and Devils Review". IGN.com. Retrieved September 14, 2009.

Untitled

The second sentence reads "In the series, Dr. Amita Ramanujan is a newly-appointed (as of the third season), though tenured, California Institute of Science (CalSci) ." Amita is a newly-appointed what, exactly? Is this meant to read "In the series, Dr. Amita Ramanujan is a newly-appointed (as of the third season), though tenured, professor at California Institute of Science (CalSci)." I can't remember details of her tenure, can anyone else confirm?

Someenigma 08:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Amita Ramanujan.jpg

Resolved

Image:Amita Ramanujan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the necessary garlic to ward off the evil Betacommanbot. TJRC (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amita's age

Under "Information", Amita's age is given as 32, but in the "Trivia"-section, it says her birthdate is 06-10-75. Does Numb3rs currently take place in 2007 or something like that? Doesn't Numb3rs-episodes take place on or around the same date and year as the respective episodes are first aired? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.60.146.225 (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References Tag

Since some references have been added to this page, I wanted to know if it is okay if I removed the "references needed" tag. If it is not, then please let me know which references have problems.SciGal (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Brian Zoromski (May 18, 2009). "Numb3rs: Angels and Devils Review". IGN.com. Retrieved September 14, 2009.

[1]