This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
A fact from Amish romance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 July 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the recent popularity of Amish romance novels has been seen as a reaction to the increasing popularity of erotic fiction such as Fifty Shades of Grey?
Perhaps i've fallen for a shuck or hoax (2 flavors of jive, i should guess) but in any case i'm at worst fascinated by our species's endless creativity. "Never in my wildest...." Someone less gobsmacked than i could add some refs supporting the reality of the genre. (All i did is apply one of the two conventions known among people for whom clear communication is a higher value than proving wrong the values of people who "don't smoke the same cigarettes as me", for identifying situations where one is quoting someone who quoted athird party, asopposed to quoting one remark, finishing with that, and then quoting a separate remark.... I 'spose denying the nature of one's species is an all-consuming task leaving little energy for rational thot, so it's all just a matter of conflict between incompatible cultures.... --Jerzy•t02:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You never really get over it, lol. I grew up in an area where these books were common (came here to make sure I wasn't misremembering), and they never stop seeming weird. cos like... objectively, they are...Keshiik (talk) 05:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
