Talk:Amiral Baudin-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 06:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

I will post a review here shortly. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Initial comments: G'day, Nate, I hope you and your family are well at this time. Nice work on this article; looks pretty good overall. I have a few minor comments/suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

• "File:Warship, Algiers, Algeria-LCCN2001697826.jpg" --> suggest cropping the border
  • Done
• the following terms appear to be overlinked: Watertight compartment, centerline (nautical), broadside
  • Fixed
• there are no dab links (no action required)
• external links all work (no action required)
• were significnatly more --> typo
  • Fixed
• As a results of the alterations --> typo
  • Good catch
• Hoche as a successor is mentioned in the infobox, but I wonder if it should be mentioned in the body of the article
  • Worked it in where it talks about the Marceaus
• The Amiral Baudin's were the first French capital ships --> not sure about the apostrophe here
  • Good catch - not sure how that made its way in there ;)
• A modified version of the 76-ton gun with a longer barrel and that had been --> "and" is probably redundant here
  • Removed
• the infobox says that the torpedo tubes were 450 mm, but the text seems to indicate that they 381 mm
  • Fixed
• sea floor but was did not become stuck --> typo
  • Whoops
• in the References, suggest translating the title of the Masson work
  • Added
• in the References, is there an OCLC or similar for the Masson work?
  • Added
• images look correctly licenced to me (no action required)
• information appears appropriately referenced (no action required)

Thanks AR. Parsecboy (talk) 11:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Well written: Y

a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research: Y

a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;

c. it contains no original research; and

d. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

3. Broad in its coverage: Y

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Y

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute Y

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: Y

a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.