Talk:Americans for Peace and Tolerance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Boston

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 3rd, 2010. The result of the discussion was No Consensus.

Severe WP:PUFF problems

The article consists entirely of an attempt to instill notability by citing sources that mention Afpat in passing to inflate the reference count; even if one were to consider all the references proper, none of the incidents noted reflect encyclopedically notable events. THF (talk) 04:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you mention your essay and template.

The references meet all guidelines. The Jerusalem Post and Boston Globe find this group to be reputable and notable enough.For these reasons, I suggest the puffery essay template be removed. Okip (formerly Ikip) 13:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notable, yes. Reputable, no. But you don't have to be reputable to be in Wikipedia (or in the newspaper). 178.39.122.125 (talk) 06:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blog

This looks like a very biased blog post and not at all a reliable source. So I'm removing it.VR _talk 04:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV pro-APT article, not an encyclopedia entry.

Someone, possibly me, needs to add balance to each of the pro-APT paragraphs, which are most of this entry's paragraphs.Haberstr (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Self-serving language from APT website

The other day I removed some self-serving language from the lead section and infobox that cited the APT's website. I cited WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:NPV. Orthogonius reverted (here, here) with unsubstantiated allegations of "misuse [of] WP standards" and POV-pushing. Orthogonius, I'll let the POV-pushing accusation go, but please explain why you think ABOUTSELF is inapplicable. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My changes were re-reverted with the cryptic comment "nothing exceptional here." Please explain. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Group dicey

The group seems to be a controversial one:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/04/07/activists-disrupt-newton-forum-prejudice/L2BaSX5YUNs3gkhERUI9AL/story.html

Afterwards, Jewish groups including ADL apologized for the group. It's evident from the Wikipedia article that this is not the first time. 178.39.122.125 (talk) 06:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lede weak

The lede is weak -- in lieu of an encyclopedic sentence or two describing their viewpoint and activities, we have a long quote from a brochure. The lede should summarize the article. 178.39.122.125 (talk) 06:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]