This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article discusses two separately named species, in separate genera. Their synonymy is not consensus yet. As is the article talks a lot about their possible synonymy, but provides very little information about the species. What information is provided (dates, description, locations) is not specific so it's impossible to know which species the info refers to (in the case they are separate). Lumping them into one article was premature and is unnecessarily confusing, making much of the article useless.
Please separate these into two separate articles. If the synonymy ever becomes settled consensus, then they can be merged.
2601:441:4900:A6E0:A99B:DF98:B1F2:83EA (talk) 21:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This article is still an incoherent, incomprehensible mess. There are also a lot of references to "Honey Lake" with no indication of where that is, and no context about why it matters. Is it the type location for one of these two species? Again, why were they merged when there's clearly no consensus about synonymizing them? 2601:441:5000:13E0:0:0:0:78AA (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
