This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Handball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Handball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HandballWikipedia:WikiProject HandballTemplate:WikiProject HandballHandball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Territories of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject United States TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject United States TerritoriesUnited States Territories articles
I have removed the tags for deletion. The comment The IHF does not list American Samoa as a team... so it doesn't appear to exist was incorrect. I encourage editors to check their comments are correct before tagging a page to be deleted. --HandballHero (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So then why does neither external source provided seem to assert its existence? And why did everything else the article's creator made get nominated for deletion as a hoax? And why did the original creator also end up blanking the page when it was brought up? Especially considering if it does exist it seems completely unnotable and the article seems to contribute nothing to wikipedia. I encourage editors to check the background of things and discuss them candidly before commenting about other editors in an accusatory, passive-agressive tone.
And, while unable to find articles corroborating its existence, I can find ones that make its existence sound wildly improbable. Like this one where the guy in charge says the sport is so unknown, it's even hard to get a kids' team going there:
