Talk:American Near East Refugee Aid
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement
[edit]This article looks like it was pretty much copied and pasted from the ANERA website, which is why it initially received the copy-vio tag. It looks like the website has since changed, and I don't know how appropriate the copy-vio tag is, but it still reads like an advertisement. I've started cleaning it up a little bit, but it needs a lot of work. -- Irn (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed the advertisement tag, but the Programs section could definitely still use some work. -- Irn (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on American Near East Refugee Aid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529234352/http://209.41.185.247/aboutUs/history.php to http://209.41.185.247/aboutUs/history.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Tone could be made more encyclopedic
[edit]The tone of the intro paragraph (mostly its last sentence) and the rest of the article give an impression that isn't quite Wikipedia-like. The content is mostly well-sourced, so the article could likely be improved by rewording without deleting content. TROPtastic (talk) 01:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)