Talk:American Journal of Biological Anthropology
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from American Journal of Biological Anthropology appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Merge Yearbook
[edit]The Yearbook of Physical Anthropology is part of the AJPA, it is a supplement issue. Abductive (reasoning) 08:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
True, but the Yearbook has its own Impact Factor. Tmckerahan (talk) 12:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Nevertheless, it seems silly to have two stubs on journals that are so closely intertwined. We also have joined articles on the Elsevier Trends journals, for example, and some journal series marked A, B, C, etc, even though they have different ISSNs and IFs. --Crusio (talk) 08:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I concur with the merging of this article into American Journal of Physical Anthropology. There are precedents for such short stubs being merged into larger articles. You simply merge it as a separate section within the main article, and create redirects to the article section for the main search terms. Again there's precedents for that. It is, in my opinion, the very fact that both the journal and the yearbook are worth knowing about that makes a merge worthwhile, for the sake of both articles.
- Some problems, and solutions to problems, are fairly self-evident. In the event the section happens to grow to the point that it warrants its own article, you split it. While I think it's unlikely the section would grow to the point warranting splitting, there is no point in speculating about it. It either won't grow that large, or it will. And if it does, it will be blindly obvious that splitting is needed. But likelihood aside, it's probably safe to say that the article won't grow that big anytime soon. Regards Wotnow (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110606064317/http://www.firstscience.com/home/news/agriculture/american-journal-of-botany-named-a-top-10-most-influential-journal-of-the-century_65814.html to http://www.firstscience.com/home/news/agriculture/american-journal-of-botany-named-a-top-10-most-influential-journal-of-the-century_65814.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Academic Journal articles
- WikiProject Academic Journal articles
- C-Class Anatomy articles
- Low-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about the field of anatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Low-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles