Talk:American Horse of the Year

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horse racing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anachronism

The article says that the award "has been awarded since 1887", which is just wrong. The title did not exist before 1936. You can't rewrite history like that just because a magazine (albeit a very good and reputable magazine) came up with a list of who would have won the awards if they had been around at the time. Please let me know if I have misunderstood this.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 23:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Divide table into sections:

Eclipse award
DRF/TRA awards
DRF award
pre-DRF era

Thoughts? Tigerboy1966 02:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Tables

Have divided up the table as above. Let me know what you think. Tigerboy1966 00:45, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Blood-horse list

The problem with the Blood-horse list is that it is just a list. There is no indication of what the names before 1936 represent, or how the "awards" were made. Is there an article available which accompanies this chart? Tigerboy1966 03:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Sortability

I have made the tables sortable. Unfortunately, the process means that the tables look less neat than they did before. Which is preferable? Tigerboy1966 10:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summary

The edit summary "removed POV" for this diff is misleading [1]. The table was divided up exactly as described in the text. Once again can I please ask you to discuss this issue either here or ~~on the relevant talk pages~~ instead of just reverting. What was wrong with dividing up the table in the way I did? Tigerboy1966 03:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Granville

Granville- the first Horse of the Year [2]

Bold

Some of the names were in bold, with no explanation. I've got nothing against bold text, but there needs to be some explanation. Tigerboy1966 20:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Horse of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131231153556/http://www.bloodhorse.com/talkinhorses/DM020708.asp to http://www.bloodhorse.com/talkinhorses/DM020708.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]