Talk:American Economic Association

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too Americentric?

I don't know much about this topic, but I'm concerned that in calling the AEA the "oldest and most important professional organization in the field of economics" that we may be neglecting important organizations outside the USA. Is this article too Americentric? Deco 04:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, most science is americentric, so it doesn't really surprise me. The AEA seems to be the most important with over 18,000 members. The Royal Economic Society, for example, claims 3,000 members. But I'm more surprised that the AEA is so small, compare it to the ACM with 82,000 members and 40 or so publications. --Vesal 14:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanderbilt

Isnt the Association housed at Vanderbilt University? The website seems to indicate so. Why isnt this mentioned in the article?

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Economic_Association"

Accusation of Bias?

I'm not entirely sure what the relevance of the "Bias" section is. If one looks at all of the social sciences, across the board there is a more progressive bent to them--Economics is no different. Why feign 1) that we can eliminate bias or should disclose it in every possible way and 2) pretend like there would even be an AEA with non-progressives at the healm. The very marker of the AEA is social scientists working with policy makers to direct national and international fiscal thinking. Isn't that in and of itself biased? I think this is less a controversy than American conservatives may want it to be. I also wonder that, if one looks at the AEA from a global perspective, if the allegiance to the Democratic party over the Republicans really matters. I propose that this section be deleted as it adds nothing to the article and is not supported anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.100.99 (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:American Economic Association/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Well, the AEA is obviously the most important economics association, but it is definitely not the oldest. See e.g. Verein für Socialpolitik.

Last edited at 08:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Attitudes of members

I have removed this section (again, after Rjensen's reversion). I do not think it is relevant to this article--the majority of articles are about the political views of economists broadly, and not really about the AEA itself. It is content far more appropriate for Economist, at best. It injects a political debate tangentially into an article on a learned society--the AEA as a body doesn't engage in political activities. It also generally smacks of WP:SYNTH. WeakTrain (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I came here specifically to find out if the AEA is a right leaning or left leaning group. Why is it so important to the editors here that I be unable to tell?24.198.110.136 (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a professional organization, not a political one. It does not, as a body, endorse political stances, so it makes little sense to even describe it as a group that leans in some particular way. (I have no idea why you were trying to determine it's political leanings, given that it doesn't engage in politics as an organization!) WeakTrain (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AEA Committees

The various AEA committees, of which the most important was the Schelling committee into AEA-backed journals in 1998, should be documented in this page.

I could do this, although since I'd probably just paraphrase the bit on them in the ICAPE history page I'd probably not do the best possible job. If anyone is hungry to document this, then they can save the page from this fate. — Charles Stewart (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]