Talk:American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Speedy Deletion

I am an editor of the Law Review. We are trying to set up a Wikipedia page. I will attempt to make this article conform with your guidelines as soon as possible. We are not advertising anything, just putting information out there about our journal, which edits and publishes scholarly works in the field of Bankruptcy Law. I guess some of this was written as us explaining our journal. It should be rewritten to be objective, I assume? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertGriswold (talk • contribs) 19:10, 9 March 2010

Yeah. That's about right. I've withdrawn the speedy deletion nomination and had a crack at tidying it up. We need to get some citations in there to establish notability, which the {{Find sources notice}} above seems to indicate is out there. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. I appreciate the comments here. When I posted it I didn't yet know of the conflict of interest section. I will also go about finding some sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertGriswold (talk • contribs) 19:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The article reads like a puff piece. Stuff like "most cutting edge cases and issues" and "All issues leave St. John's University in final photo-ready form for immediate and timely publication" don't belong in an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.68.16.91 (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]