Talk:America West Airlines Flight 556

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm editing the violation of America West Policy.. Depending on AWA's definition of a "flight" the pilots had 8 minutes from opening their bar tab at 10:30 p.m. until the 12 hour cut off at 10:38 p.m. As this also leads into the defense argument I think its better to go a little more general, and not adopt a specific POV. If however information about AWA's policy definition of a "flight" was added to the article to clarify when it begins to better define the 12 hour rule, that would be great Cliffb 22:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would think the prosecution could have come back and argued that they had every intention of knocking back a few. After all, they were good enough to get the tug driver to admit he didn't start driving the tug until the pilots ordered him to do so.Blueboy96 02:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Legally drunk

I'm not a native speaker, but shouldn't it be "illegally drunk"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.98.0 (talk) 23:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Legally drunk" in this case means "drunk in the legal sense". Compare legally blind, which does not refer to actual blindness, just vision impaired to the point where the law equates it to blindness. Also, note that being drunk is in itself not actually illegal (in the vast majority of locales), it is the performance of certain actions while drunk which is illegal. Of course, some real native speaker will probably turn up and correct me here...85.224.98.84 (talk) 23:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]