Talk:America's Next Top Model season 5
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the America's Next Top Model season 5 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
unknown
[edit]Tajha , Jessica ; There was no model by these name for this cycle. Jessica is cycle 12. Tajha don't exist. Somebody re edit the episode summaries please.
Challenge win
[edit]Since I have been asked: I have put the winners of the photo challenge (country couture photoshoot) as challenge winners as it was a challenge within the shoot. I didn't find it necessary to add another color but I found it necessary to add this piece of information.--Whadaheck (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's been too long since I've seen the episode. What qualifies that as a challenge, and what was the reward? --Misty Willows (talk) 19:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's a challenge as it is a competition and the reward was to be safe from elimination and to be featured in a fake fashion story--Whadaheck (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- That is neither a challenge nor a reward. Please stop making up reward challenges, if it isn't stated as a reward challenge in the show, then it isn't one.-15:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- If it has a winner and a reward then it is one.--Whadaheck (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- not being eliminated isn't a reward, unless the were granted immunity from elimination, which there is no evidence of, it would have been entirely possible for the the winner of a pair to still have been eliminated. if you persist to make these edits, without an attempt at consensus , I will seek the intervention of Administrators -Misty Willows (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- They did get immunity, only the "worst 6" were at risk. Indeed they each winner was part of the first 6 called, each loser was part of the last 6 called.--Whadaheck (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- I watched that episode again on YouTube. I didn't hear anyone say anything about immunity if I missed it tell me EXACLTY where it was stated that they have immunity. - Misty Willows (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- The word immunity wasn't uttered BUT Tyra said "For each of the pairs of photographs we picked the strongest one, which means 6 of you did well, and when you see your face on the screen in this magazine layout that means thet you will still be in the running" and "the six weakest pictures are what you all represent right now, which means one of you will go home".--Whadaheck (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- But that was after the fact at panel, it was a description of how the judging would be done, it wasn't a reward. It is no different than any other week, where the people with the best pictures were not at risk of being eliminated. -Misty Willows (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes it is. Because it was the best girl out of each pair, not the best girls of the twelve.--Whadaheck (talk) 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- But that was after the fact at panel, it was a description of how the judging would be done, it wasn't a reward. It is no different than any other week, where the people with the best pictures were not at risk of being eliminated. -Misty Willows (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- The word immunity wasn't uttered BUT Tyra said "For each of the pairs of photographs we picked the strongest one, which means 6 of you did well, and when you see your face on the screen in this magazine layout that means thet you will still be in the running" and "the six weakest pictures are what you all represent right now, which means one of you will go home".--Whadaheck (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I watched that episode again on YouTube. I didn't hear anyone say anything about immunity if I missed it tell me EXACLTY where it was stated that they have immunity. - Misty Willows (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- See the table below. --ApprenticeFan Messages Work 16:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Are you saying you Agree with Whadaheck, or are you pointing out vandalisms? Please be more specific - Misty Willows (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- They did get immunity, only the "worst 6" were at risk. Indeed they each winner was part of the first 6 called, each loser was part of the last 6 called.--Whadaheck (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- That is neither a challenge nor a reward. Please stop making up reward challenges, if it isn't stated as a reward challenge in the show, then it isn't one.-15:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's a challenge as it is a competition and the reward was to be safe from elimination and to be featured in a fake fashion story--Whadaheck (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
It is definitely not a reward challenge. The top 6 could have easily ended up in the bottom two if one of them said they did not want to be there and the judges could simply eliminate them because they didn't have the passion for it etc. In other words you are just making out a reward challenge for the sake of having your personal opinion presented on a table which has been confirmed and finalized for the past 3 years or so. If it's ain't broke, don't fix it.ZephyrWind (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have to disagree. Both Coryn and Cassandra were criticized during panel and still were called 1st and 3rd. It definitely was a challenge, even though the reward wasn't stated as clearly as it could've been. And by the way, the table has undergone quite a few changes in the last 3 years.--Whadaheck (talk) 13:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Call-out Order
[edit]Do you guys know where the chart that held the call-out order went? Someone must have deleted for some odd reason. To whoever does the chart: can you make it again? Thanks in advance.
-CrossingGuard 05:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Who was the designer of the final runway contest?
--24.252.67.157 05:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Ms. F
Please fix the page
[edit]Why do people ruin pages on purpose? It's so rude. Can someone please fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.201.84.139 (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- The page is not semi-protected, so feel free to fix the problems yourself. If you prefer, I could do it, but you'll need to point out what specifically needs fixing. Eatcacti (talk) 22:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The Call Out order isn't right...
[edit]The call out order states that Lisa won when really Nicole did. Please fix this. This is misleading info.\Jkeezy1990 (talk) 23:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
That table states that Nicole was eliminated during the 4th episode which can't be true 'cause she won... and in the text is written that in that episode Sarah left while the table states she already left before... i haven't seen teh complete cycle yet so i can't fix it myself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.70.119.255 (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Call-out order # 3
[edit]An anonymous user added colors in third episode which was a call-out order which Lisa won the reward challenge.
- Call-out order
Order | Episodes | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||||
1 | Cassandra | Nik | Cassandra | Jayla | Kyle | Lisa | Kim | Bre | Kim | Nik | Nicole | Nik | Nicole | ||
2 | Nik | Lisa | Nicole | Kyle | Jayla | Jayla | Lisa | Kim | Bre | Jayla | Nik | Nicole | Nik | ||
3 | Kyle | Cassandra | Coryn | Nik | Nik | Kim | Nik | Nik | Nicole | Nicole | Bre | Bre | |||
4 | Ashley | Diane | Kim | Bre | Lisa | Nicole | Jayla | Lisa | Nik | Bre | Jayla | ||||
5 | Bre | Jayla | Lisa | Lisa | Nicole | Kyle | Nicole | Jayla | Jayla | Kim | |||||
6 | Kim | Kyle | Nik | Diane | Kim | Bre | Bre | Nicole | Lisa | ||||||
7 | Sarah | Bre | Bre | Coryn | Coryn | Nik | Kyle | ||||||||
8 | Jayla | Ebony | Jayla | Nicole | Bre | Coryn | |||||||||
9 | Coryn | Coryn | Sarah | Kim | Diane | ||||||||||
10 | Nicole | Nicole | Kyle | Sarah | |||||||||||
11 | Diane | Kim | Diane | Cassandra | |||||||||||
12 | Lisa | Sarah | Ebony | ||||||||||||
13 | Ebony | Ashley |
- The contestant won the reward challenge
- The contestant was eliminated
- The contestant was CoverGirl of the Week
- The contestant was CoverGirl of the Week & reward winner
- The contestant was CoverGirl of the Week & won two challenges
- The contestant quit the competition
- The contestant was part of a non-elimination bottom two
- The contestant won the competition
Eventually, Lisa is the winner of not one but two challenges along with CoverGirl of the week. Since Lisa won the challenge, not one but five other contestants won the week's challenge (Cassandra, Nicole, Coryn, Kim and Nik). --ApprenticeFan Messages Work 06:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
I think this is nonsense.ZephyrWind (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I have to ask...
[edit]Why "Jessica"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwimusume (talk • contribs) 08:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
We have a problem!!!!!!
[edit]For "The Girls Became Superheroes", where is Nicole and her walk theme?!?!?!?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.166.197 (talk) 23:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Up-date to Final Episode of Cycle 5
[edit]After watching THS (True Hollywood Story) on E! -- I found that due to the bombing that took place in London during the season's last show - the runway show was moved back to the States..... This can be check for the show date in question from E! and a reference point should be added to the cycle 5 section plus a point shold also be listed in the main ANTM section of Wikipeida..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.23.85.188 (talk) 20:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Edit request from Stillmind14, 9 June 2010
[edit]The page is full of grammatical errors. Put simply, it needs to be fixed.
Stillmind14 (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done You need to list specifics, if you want to fix it, I'll move it all to a sandbox that you can edit and fix. CTJF83 pride 20:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Edit request from Malice826, 7 December 2010
[edit]{{edit semi-protected}}
Makeovers
[edit]- Ebony: Braided hair extensions
- Cassandra: Mia Farrow inspired cut in the film Rosemary's Baby and dyed blonde
- Sarah: Assymmetrical haircut
- Diane: Fringe and blonde highlights
- Coryn: Honey Blonde hair extensions
- Kyle: Dyed brown and dark hair extensions
- Lisa: Dyed blonde and cut short
- Kim: Dyed red
- Jayla: Hair extensions removed and cut shorter
- Bre: Hair straightening with a full fringe
- Nik: Dyed light brown
- Nicole: Darkened hair extensions for adding volume and curls more defined
Malice826 (talk) 02:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Can you please explain why this is better than the current style-based descriptions currently in the article? Can you clarify whether the terms currently in the article were used in the actual show, or whether the above terms were used? Qwyrxian (talk) 00:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Agreeing with the previous statement. I'm going to collapse the template for now. elektrikSHOOS 22:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Can Makeovers Be Added?
[edit]Here they are:
Ebony - Braided hair weave
Cassandra - Mia Farrow inspired pixie haircut and dyed blonde; never finished
Sarah - Asymmetrical haircut
Diane - Wheat-colored hair
Coryn - Blonde hair extensions and eyebrows shaped
Kyle - Dyed chocolate brown
Lisa - Darkened; later, dyed a believable-looking blonde
Kim - Dyed dark red
Jayla - Straight hair extensions; later, bob haircut
Bre - Straightened and bangs added
Nik - Sun-kissed blonde
Nicole - Big curly hair weave
--216.118.143.198 (talk) 19:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can't include these per WP:OR and WP:POV. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Edit request from Susanddavis, 11 February 2011
[edit]{{edit semi-protected}} There is a grammatical/typing error in the information about Bre and the granola bar:
"An argument brewed between Bre and Nicole over Bre's stolen granola bars. Bre thought Nicole stole them and dumped Nicole's Red Bull. Nicole really wanted to pay Red Bull to Bre."
The 3rd sentence should say "Nicole really wanted Bre to pay for the Red Bull." Also, the word "really" is not necessary.
Susanddavis (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)susanddavis
Susanddavis (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)susanddavis
- Done -Atmoz (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Cassandras name & Table widths
[edit]Since i find that shortening Cassandras name to Cassie or Cassy - (Naturally) is wrong, I added some widths to the table in the article. The name does not make the table expand the whole way, and by adding widths you can manipulate the look of the table so that is does not look as clunky / and - or bunched up as it formerly did. It just makes an eyesore that does not really need to be there. There was a case like this in cycle eleven, with Lauren-Brie, but Samantha's name was there to compensate even though L-B'S name did not expand the whole way either. Seeing that the names here are all relatively short with the exception of Cassandra, i think i made the right call. Comments or concerns please reply here. Or my talk page. 98.206.38.163 (talk) 02:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:America's Next Top Model, Cycle 1 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on America's Next Top Model (cycle 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130502010944/http://www.smgmodels.com:80/models/index.php?cat=Women&sex=F to http://www.smgmodels.com/models/index.php?cat=Women&sex=F
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on America's Next Top Model (cycle 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120215000504/http://www.oxygen.com/tvshows/topmodel/extras/QA/ashleyBlack.aspx?page=3 to http://www.oxygen.com/tvshows/topmodel/extras/QA/ashleyBlack.aspx?page=3
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100104104804/http://www.redeyereview.com:80/movies/2009/fast_furious to http://www.redeyereview.com/movies/2009/fast_furious
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:America's Next Top Model (cycle 1) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Reality television articles
- Low-importance Reality television articles
- Reality television task force articles
- Start-Class Top Model articles
- Mid-importance Top Model articles
- Top Model task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class fashion articles
- Low-importance fashion articles