Talk:America's Climate Security Act of 2007

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Reaction Section

This section, if not the entire article is totally in favor of the bill. The Wall Street Journal and the Economist (outlets with actual economic knowledge) are against it, yet there is no mention of them. Total POV at this point. 98.218.141.145 (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you add to it then? isn't that the point of this little venture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.93.66 (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

filibuster vote?

could we a post a list of who voted for the filibuster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.66.62 (talk) 23:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]