Talk:Amastra subsoror

Gastropods Low‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Now slightly better?

I came to this article from the random article portal, and chose to delve into it as an exercise to see what I could do to improve it, given that it has extremely little internet presence and has probably never had human eyes devoted to it for any significant period of time in recent memory. Result: I was able to improve some things, but not much, and pretty much nothing that could have been done by a bot or even semi-automated. So it looks like we're doing alright collecting info. - Sdkb (talk) 21:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going viral?

If a gallon of Tuscan milk can have thousands of customer reviews on Amazon, I don't see why we can't have hundreds of comments at Talk:Amastra subsoror. Could happen. Just sayin'. Mathglot (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree wholeheartedly. jp×g 02:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The snail may have gone extinct, but that doesn't mean its talk page will! jlwoodwa (talk) 06:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]