Jump to content

Talk:Amar la Trama/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Well written with no errors. I'm impressed with this.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Complies to WP:MOS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Properly referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    One small thing. The reference for the chart performance should be placed at the chart, and not at the heading of the table. As it's a small thing, I've moved the ref, but it's worth remember for the future.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Images all check out.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    All in all, an almost perfect score, with a few minor issues which I have fixed. It is not a requirement, but if you have a music sample, it would be nice to include it. I am confident that the article complies with GA requirements and standards, and am happy to pass this. Well done!