Talk:Amar la Trama/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Properly referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- One small thing. The reference for the chart performance should be placed at the chart, and not at the heading of the table. As it's a small thing, I've moved the ref, but it's worth remember for the future.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Complies to WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images all check out.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- All in all, an almost perfect score, with a few minor issues which I have fixed. It is not a requirement, but if you have a music sample, it would be nice to include it. I am confident that the article complies with GA requirements and standards, and am happy to pass this. Well done!
- Pass or Fail: