This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
I see my removal of the list of clients was challenged.
I know very well indeed the historical (and current) significance of the bank, but it nonetheless needs a WP article that shows the information in an objective fashion without looking as if it is promotional. In general, displaying a list of clients at a bank article would be considered very highly promotional, but there might be cases where there is sufficient of a special relationship to include one or more. It could be argued that the labor and liberal organization that are principal clients are indeed in such a relationship (if I wanted to be nit-picky, I could say we need a third-party source that these are not only clients but significant clients--otherwise it might be considered cherry-picking those clients that happen to be labor or progressive in order to make a point--after all, there are many other labor unions--where do they bank?). I've chosen a more compact display--perhaps it will do better. DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
