Talk:Am I Right
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Will need some more changes on this article, any help will be appreciated. -Iamhungey
- Don't worry, I'm currently writing a massive expansion, Iamhungey. Bobo. 07:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think this article is large enough as it is. Actually, I was thinking of deleting a lot of the lists, as well as the "controversy" section, which isn't doesn't actually discuss any controversies. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia article, not an advertisement or a table of contents. --Maxamegalon2000 11:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's not quite finished, but there it is in a sensible and concise form. Bobo. 11:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think this article is large enough as it is. Actually, I was thinking of deleting a lot of the lists, as well as the "controversy" section, which isn't doesn't actually discuss any controversies. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia article, not an advertisement or a table of contents. --Maxamegalon2000 11:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
My edit
[edit]Hi. I got rid of a lot of the description of every single section of the website, amongst other things. This article does not need to go into that much detail, especially when readers can just visit the site themselves. I also got rid of the section on the message board, which basically only mentioned that there is a message board, and the section on traffice, which basically only mentioned that the site gets traffic. I also brought back the section on the recognitions, which was really the only think that kept me from nominating this article for deletion a few weeks ago. --Maxamegalon2000 22:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Radio interview
[edit]I just added information on the EZHelp Radio Show interview that was given today. It's under acclaim, because I wasn't sure what the appropriate section of the article would be. Maybe we could change the section title to "Publicity and Acclaim" or something like that. PF4Eva 22:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC) Sounds good. --Maxamegalon2000 22:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)