Talk:Alvin C. Graves/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 01:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Compton replied that he wcould Fermi, not explained, should be linked the suicide squad thing needs a bit more explanation, would the cadmium salts stop the chain reaction? Why suicide squad? was seven months pregnant Graves therefore requested link Roentgen (unit)? working and skiing Graves became dismissive of the radiation risks from nuclear testing; while serving as test director for the Nevada Test Site shots during the 1950s. I would say the semi-colon could be dispensed with. Should the period in weak malingerers." should be after the quotation mark? he ~~would speak~~spoke most of the Aatomic tests suggest A 1978 follow-up study all points addressed
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Given the fact that the accident killed someone and made him very sick for a while, I think it should be mentioned in the lead. addressed.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	~~On hold for seven days, a few prose comments that need to be addressed.~~ Otherwise, great article. Passing.

All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]