Talk:Aluminium/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kepler-1229b (talk · contribs) 18:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	A rather technical topic.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	No issues noted.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Sourced.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No apparent plagiarism or copyright violations.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issues noted.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Fine.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass?

@Kepler-1229b: Do you have any specific concerns re 1a? Double sharp (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kepler-1229b: Double sharp (talk) 13:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 21:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An observation, the first five (5) sentences of the lead all start "Aluminium..." - that should be tweaked if possible....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Casliber: Tweaked it. Double sharp (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So pass? Keresluna (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kepler-1229b:Keresluna (talk) 22:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pass, it has been two months. I see no reason to oppose that change. Keresluna (talk) 17:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]