Talk:Alturas, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Fair use rationale for Image:Alturas.jpg

Image:Alturas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doubious source I

(Copied from the Modoc County Talk page, where this is already an issue.)

It may be tempting cite from a source such the local Chamber of Commerce for additional information about a city or county, but in this case at least, the Alturas Chamber of Commerce web site's History page is questionable. While some content seems to be original work dating to 1992, some has been added so recently that Google hasn't collected it into their search engine yet, and it's a collection of snippets of information plagiarized from a variety of uncredited sources. This came to my attention when I recognized some of my own work on their page.

Their original work contains contradictions of scholarly works, without citing a source.

Googling a selection of phrases that should be unique to their page shows that these phrases occurred earlier on other web sites:

This is not to say that the Alturas Chamber of Commerce web site is of no use to us. However, having found information on it, we would be wise to google the phrase we want to cite, in order to find the original source, and determine whether it is reliable. Downstrike (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious source II

Re: "Alturas/Modoc County has a local independent television station KMDC on channel 9."

There have never been any Television broadcasting facilities in Alturas. The nearest are in Klamath Falls, OR and Redding, CA, both at least 100 miles away. Further, Modoc County is part of the Redding/Chico television market, for which channel 9 is occupied by KIXE in Redding.

This raises doubts about all unsourced assertions in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Downstrike (talk • contribs) 05:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing debatable here. A search of the FCC database reveals no television licenses for the call sign KMDC in Modoc county or anywhere else in the United States. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.220.109 (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alturas, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

City's remote location

I do not necessarily agree on "the city's remote location". It's a relative argument (like speed which needs a frame of reference for comparison).

ICE77 (talk) 01:40, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]