Talk:Altamont School

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Altamont School be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Assess

Nearly a "start" ... alumni gets a mid. Use the ref tag and add some pics. More topics. Welcome Victuallers 13:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have enhanced the article and am upgrading its assessment to Start class. Majoreditor 03:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

For alumni, I have added sources for each one stating that he or she is, in fact, an alum. Some of these sources are self-published by the school, but not all. Wikipedia guidelines say that self-published sources are generally allowed as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves. So the school itself ought to be allowed as a source of information about itself. Maybe there are some better sources out there for stating definitively that these various alumni attended the school, but is their status as alumni really in any kind of dispute? Also, I added a couple of non-school sources about the basic facts of the school. I can look for some more. Again, this is a pretty non-controversial article. With a couple of non-school published sources now added, I don't think it merits a third-party sources tag. Dunncon13 (talk) 20:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]