Talk:alt.atheism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alt.atheism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Atheism Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity

To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members.
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt-an-article.
Help out with this to-do list.

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references).
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly.
Always write for an encyclopedia.

Articles to improve

Agnosticism

Create

Articles on notable atheists

Expand

an atheism stub

Immediate attention

State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 20 May 2009, see discussion.
No consensus, 19 April 2008, see discussion.
Keep, 27 August 2007, see discussion.

About the external links

alt-atheism.org is the "official" (as such goes on Usenet) website of the newsgroup. I host and maintain the site so it's technically "mine" but if anyone is worried about potential self-promotion, they can check with the regulars on the newsgroup to confirm alt-atheism.org is the recognized group site. It is, definitely, the location of the official FAQ maintained by Michelle Malkin.

--Mark K. Bilbo 15:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Minor corrections and changes

There was a semi-colon preceeding the list of alt.atheism sub-groups; I replaced it with a colon.

The line about Satanic child abuse was rewritten to point to the article on Satanic ritual abuse, as the "specific cases" section deals mostly with alleged abuse towards children. The word "children" in the edit now points to the "child abuse" article.

No mention is made that alt.atheism.moderated has been down for well over a year.

"Subgroups" and such

It's not really accurate to say alt.atheism (or any Usenet newsgroup) is "subdivided" into other groups. Even though they may be arranged heirarchically, they act as independent groups. Also added that alt.atheism.moderated has apparently been abandoned. It's discussed sporadically on alt.atheism but nobody seems overly concerned about having a moderated group again.

Finally, I'm not sure it's quite appropriate but I'm pleading special circumstances. I host the newsgroup's website and live just outside the Katrina disaster area. I took the site down for the evacuation (and pulled hard drives like crazy) and the machine has been flaky since. I doubt the site will be up this year. Things are, well, difficult since Katrina visited. Mark K. Bilbo 03:48, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

I think that the first sentence in the last section is very POV, by claiming that only fundamentalists would protest alt.atheism. The sentence seems very loaded to make people think ill of thiests. Lord of Light 22:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. My experience with alt.atheism is many years out of date, but when I did read it regularly (around 1993), the most disruptive influence was in fact from Christian fundamentalists. If that continued, then their identification as such is simply factual. However, I wouldn't call what they did "trolling". It usually started as honest proselytizing, followed by heated argument and/or extended debate when they were not taken seriously. This was disruptive, and off-charter (though those debates were precisely what I liked about alt.atheism), but it wasn't trolling. 83.216.23.130 18:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the sentence lacks NPOV. It mentions that most of the people who've been trolling the site are fundamentalists. This is not an opinion, it's just a fact.--Orthologist 13:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm on alt.atheism now and it's true there's a lot of trolling by fundamentalists. Interestingly enough, the number of Muslim proselytizers is on the upswing in recent years. Mark K. Bilbo 01:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty clear that there's no NPOV problem with that section, so I'm going to remove the NPOV tag. (If there are additional fundamentalists causing lots of trouble, they can be added separately.) CSWarren 01:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually if the purpose of the group is to promote atheism then it should welcome those who disagree and debate with them, not make fun of them or call them names. It its purpose is to be a social club for atheists (nothing wrong with that) then outsiders are trolls. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I finally tracked down my original announcement of the newsgroup

For those of you who have been hounding me for decades to document the date of creation and the identity of the creator. Here you go. 2/6/1990 was when I issued the newgroup command for alt.atheism, and I tracked down a copy of my announcement of same in alt.pagan using Google Groups. Enjoy. =brian Bhawthorne (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And, yes, I have changed my last name since then. Actually, I changed it in August of 1990! Bhawthorne (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]