Jump to content

Talk:Alopekis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alopekis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Alopekis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

"...scholars have recognized an alopekis (dXanreKis), a Thracian type of cap which Orpheus is regularly shown as wearing from about the middle of the fifth century BC..." - The Orpheus Metope from Bassai, Annual of the British School at Athens, Volume 76, November 1981, pp. 323-328, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068245400019572

The article has only one reliable WP:TERTIARY source to indicate that this dog exists, therefore I am not convinced that the topic meets WP:NOTABILITY.

Further, the dog in the picture does not match the description provided by Studdert in the lead sentence. William Harristalk 08:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I help the Alopekis article

[edit]

I would like to expand it

Nathan;dlsa (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Nathan;dlsa[reply]

Added Alopekis personality

[edit]

I have added section about Alopekis personality Mark.barkan (talk) 11:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Created by Annwfwn (talk). Self-nominated at 19:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Alopekis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • DYK eligibility scan results: (See here for details.)
    • Prose size (text only): 5450 characters (876 words) "readable prose size"
    • Article created by Fainomenon on November 22, 2013
    • Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 197 edits ago on November 22, 2013
    • Article has not been created or expanded 5x or promoted to Good Article within the past 10 days (3582 days) DYKcheck does not account for previous versions with splits or copyright violations.
    • hook is interesting and citation is verified.
    • no QPQ done - Under 5
  • fix the issues or this cannot proceed. awkwafaba (📥) 01:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Awkwafaba:, prior to September 12th, 2023, the article was 125 words long. I expanded it 5x. Annwfwn (talk) 12:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: digging into the history more, it seems you may be right. Have you done your QPQ yet? awkwafaba (📥) 12:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Awkwafaba: No this is my fourth nomination, I should have a QPQ ready for my next nomination. Annwfwn (talk) 12:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: then you're all set. Approved
@Awkwafaba: This is not a complete DYK review. Please follow the instructions at WP:DYKRI. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cielquiparle: that is what I was going by. Can you be specific at all? awkwafaba (📥) 16:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: Looks like you did not address possible copyright violations or address whether the article is adequately sourced to reliable sources. Also, remember: The fact cited in the hook needs to be stated within the article. ALT0 is great and is correct, but it is not stated explicitly in the article. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cielquiparle: The fact is in the article: "Xenophon describes the alopekis as one of the two main Greek examples of hunting dogs in his work "Cynegeticus".[10] Ancient authors believed that alopekis were created by mating dogs and foxes". And I stated above that I verified the source. There are no copyright issues, according to earwig. Is there something I am missing? awkwafaba (📥) 16:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: Earwig doesn't work with offline and paywalled sources. Also, did you check the Greek sources? If not, the grey tick ("AGF on offline, non-English sources") is more appropriate than the green one. The sentences you quoted do not state that Xenophon specifically thought the alopekis was part dog, part fox. They only state that Xenophon wrote about the alopekis and that the ancient authors had a certain belief. It would be better to reword that part of the article so that the fact stated in the hook is clearer (as it's apparent when you read the primary source authored by Xenophon). Cielquiparle (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cielquiparle:I edited the article to better reflect the DYK. Annwfwn (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: Much better thanks. A few remaining issues to fix: 1) Not convinced DogTime is a reliable source (as it explicitly states it receives a commission on product sales). Could you try to find a better source to replace it? Perhaps a book from a reputable publisher, for example? (Check Google Books, Internet Archive, Wikipedia Library, etc.) 2) The section on "Temperament" does not sound encyclopedic; it reads like someone's opinion on a blog. Could you please take a look at rewording that to be more neutral (and attribute the parts that are "opinion" to specific sources?) 3) Please resolve the citation needed tag. Cielquiparle (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cielquiparle: done, thank you. Annwfwn (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: thanks for updating the text in the article. @Cielquiparle: there is nothing in the DYKI that says a reviewer needs to verify any other citations in the article, only the ones on the suggested hooks. I'm not sure why for your review of {{Did you know nominations/BOW counties}} you feel the need to verify the extraneous citations in Alopekis. This is not a GAR. The only references flagged by the script are the Greek City Times ("generaly unreliable") and Elsevier (May contain preprints and such). The former only repeats what two other RS state, and the latter is not a preprint or anything. Even the Dog Time source is just supporting other citations, other than the weight. I'm not sure why this is getting so involved, but maybe you can save some for the FAR? DYK is not supposed to be a huge hurdle. One of its purposes is to get new editors more involved, and I'm not sure this is happening rght now. awkwafaba (📥) 14:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: DYK is a lot stricter these days and the guidelines are clearly stated in WP:DYKCRIT and specifically WP:DYKCITE with regard to sourcing. It's much better if we fix the sourcing issues now and even better if we get the nominator and/or new editors to do it, because they learn from the experience. If we don't sort it out now, the article could get orange-tagged so it can't run at all, or if it's flagged by one of the thousands of readers on the day at WP:ERRORS, the DYK nomination could get pulled at the last minute without completing its run, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. (I'm actually very upbeat that this article is starting to look much better!) Cielquiparle (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: is there another source you can use to corroborate what DogTime has? awkwafaba (📥) 17:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: With some modification, yes. This is done. Annwfwn (talk) 12:13, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: I think in the health section too. You don't need to remove DogTime, you just need another source to support it. awkwafaba (📥) 13:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: the best I can do is just remove that sentence which is done. Annwfwn (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: you removed the whole section? It was the only citation there, and it was used twice. I don't think it was bad, it just could use some support. awkwafaba (📥) 20:13, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: I removed only the one sentence as I couldn't find an alternate source. 20:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: Can you add the other reference? DogTime is the only source for that section. awkwafaba (📥) 20:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Awkwafaba: oops, no. That was the only source that I could find, its fixed. Annwfwn (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: I can see no remaining concerns. re-approved awkwafaba (📥) 13:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alopekis&oldid=1204750173"