Talk:Alma Howard
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Importance
[edit]Being bold and assigning this as top importance on the grounds that she made a fundamental discovery creating a new field. She edited the major international journal in her field and while she might not have achieved household-name status, she was a woman scientist working basically outside the university system who happened to publish at the same time as probably the most fundamental biomedical paper of the 20th century. I've looked at other top rated Women Scientists in the project and it does not seem to be completely out of line. Other editors from the Women scientists project might be able to bring any further consideration to bear. JBVaughan (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/16 December 2016
- Accepted AfC submissions
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Women scientists articles
- Top-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles