Talk:Alliance for Financial Inclusion

Alliance for Financial Inclusion was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 22, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Maya Taylor (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (declared in edit summary)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

AFIxMastercard Foundation.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alliance for Financial Inclusion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 18:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created, edited, and nominated by a single-purpose account who, when questioned over a potential conflict-of-interest, gave a suspiciously-specific denial that neither he nor his family were actually employees of the organization. Tagged with a COI banner since June. Working Groups section is entirely self-sourced, Members is unsourced, and Donors and partners is self-sourced. It's not clear that any of the sources are independent, reliable, and in-depth about this organization. Vague and promotional language (e.g. "there was an emerging recognition") also problematic with respect to Good Article criteria 1. A long way from meeting GA criterion 2 and probably 1 and 4. Has major cleanup banner that is plausibly valid. WP:GAFAIL. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]