Talk:Alleghanian orogeny

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Alleghanian orogeny is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This discussion page is telling me there is no article called "Alleghenian orogeny" but of course there is. This page is a start, but this orogeny is apparently a very complex and multifarious event. Apparently there were many sub-orogenies that are considered part of this one, beginning well before the collision of Laurentia with Africa? It would be nice to get a more detailed writeup giving all the forces, events, places and times involved.

Factual error?

"Approximately 350 million to 300 million years ago, in the Carboniferous period, the combined continents of Europe and Africa (Gondwana) collided with North America to form the supercontinent of Pangaea."

It was Euramerica (Europe and North America) which collided with Gondwana. (See these Missisippian and Pennsylvanian maps).--Jyril 19:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alleghenian or Alleghanian or Appalachian?

Google Books gives a slight edge to Alleghanian

824 results for "Alleghanian orogeny" in books since 1993
588 results for "Alleghenian orogeny" in books since 1993
428 results or "Appalachian orogeny" in books since 1993

Google Scholar prefers Alleghanian

898 results for "Alleghanian orogeny" in papers since 1993
383 results for "Appalachian orogeny" in papers since 1993
327 results for "Alleghenian orogeny" in papers since 1993

The Britannica article is titled Alleghenian orogeny.

I think we should use Alleghanian, due to both specialized Google searches showing its popularity. —hike395 (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Especially since the mountains are spelled Allegheny, though many little towns are "Alleghany". Keep 'em guessing!--Wetman (talk) 22:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry --- I don't understand what you are suggesting. Do you wish to propose a move? —hike395 (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laurasia vs Euramerica

My last edit marked the reversion as vandalism: that was an error, I'm assuming good faith for the anon editor. I believe that Euramerica is the correct term for the continent in the Paleozoic, while Laurasia is a term for the Mesozoic (please correct me if I am wrong). Pangaea also seems to be the spelling preferred by WP. —hike395 (talk) 12:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map

If anyone has a better map, such as one showing the entire extent of the orogeny, that would be a great addition. I added a map available from wiki-commons because I felt at least one location map was needed. Elriana (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alleghanian orogeny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2009/11/03-02.html?etoc
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117093921/http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/Mtleconte/website/geology.html?etoc to http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/Mtleconte/website/geology.html?etoc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]