Talk:War crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan civil war

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the War crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan civil war article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 30 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Sri Lanka, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about War crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan civil war. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about War crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan civil war at the Reference desk.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 December 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

On 11 January 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to War crimes in the Sri Lankan Civil War. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Sri Lanka High‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sri Lanka Reconciliation (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Sri Lanka ReconciliationWikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka ReconciliationTemplate:WikiProject Sri Lanka ReconciliationSri Lanka Reconciliation articles

Tamil Eelam (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil Eelam, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil EelamWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil EelamTemplate:WikiProject Tamil EelamTamil Eelam articles

Military history: Asian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Intro

@Oz346, can you please show which part of the article covers UN Secretary-General actions post getting his report? Cossde (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RS: ITJP

@Petextrodon: can you please prove ITJP is a WP:RS. Cossde (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cossde the burden of proof is on you since you're the one who claimed it was unreliable. If ITJP is good enough to be cited by mainstream news outlets and scholars, then it's good enough for Wikipedia. Besides, it's not cited as a fact, but only as an estimate of an explicitly attributed NGO which is well within Wiki guideline. -- Petextrodon (talk) 19:46, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Petextrodon, as the editor who added/restored content its your burden of proof per WP:BURDEN prove that ITJP fits the WP:RS requirement. It would save all our time and have a constructive discussion, if you can provide specific responses like Pharaoh of the Wizards and generic answers that doesn't help. Cossde (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yasmin Sooka who was a member of the Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka is the Executive Director of The International Truth and Justice Project .It is quoted by the BBC here ,here ,here .Department of justice here CNN here ,here ,here.Do think ITJP is WP:RS.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pharaoh of the Wizards, the quotations provided by you indicate that these RS have used ITJP as a primary source. Can you please share RS that have quoted ITJP on the number of Tamil civilians killed. Cossde (talk) 04:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As Petextrodon and Pharaoh already mention, it's been cited repeatedly by other RS, both in mainstream news outlets and scholarship. The organisation is also directed by Yasmin Sooka (one of the UN panel experts and human rights lawyer). It is therefore reputable and acceptable to be cited with explicit attribution, as it has been done here. Oz346 (talk) 08:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oz346, then you will have no problem, sharing citations of other RS of the number Tamil civilians killed. And putting this matter to rest. Cossde (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no Wikipedia policy saying that every detail in every human rights group report needs to be individually cited by other RS in order to be included (and that a detail which has already been cited with explicit attribution). Please keep to Wikipedia policies. Oz346 (talk) 12:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oz346, are you saying that ITJP figurs have not been cited by mainstream news outlets? If not please share the citations. After all this whole discusion start due to it.Cossde (talk) 14:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And while we are on the topic of RS, why is a well known bogus report from the Sri lankan government apologist LLRC being cited on this page?

https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa37/008/2011/en/

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2010/09/sril-s01.html

The commission has been heavily criticised by international human rights groups, the UN Panel of Experts and others due its limited mandate, alleged lack of independence and its failure to meet minimum international standards or offer protection to witnesses.[4][7] These critics believed that the Sri Lankan government was using the commission as a tool to prevent an independent international investigation of alleged abuses.[8] As a consequence of this Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Crisis Group refused to appear before the commission.[9]

If you think reputable human rights and UN panel expert Yasmin Sooka's ITJP reports needs to be removed, than the bogus clown LLRC report needs to be banished to hell by that metric. Oz346 (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oz346, "bogus clown LLRC" is that WP:NPOV? Cossde (talk) 14:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]