Talk:All We Know
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the All We Know article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on All We Know (The Chainsmokers song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151015024916/http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/ to http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 1 March 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 21:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
– Per WP:PTOPIC. OK, this song is recent. However, there are only two WP:N topics named "All We Know": All We Know (The Chainsmokers song) and All We Know (Paramore song). It should be pretty obvious that the song by the Chainsmokers is far more significant than the song by Paramore, and will likely remain so. feminist 10:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. WP never bases its article titles on what is popular this week, or we'd be renaming thousands of articles per day. WP:PRIMARY is about lasting cultural significance in the minds of the public and in reliable sources, not temporary sales. Any time a WP:RM says something like "OK, this song is recent. However ...", then a mistake is being made. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- The other song does not have
lasting cultural significance
either, after more than a decade. feminist 07:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- The other song does not have
- Support. Of course - Paramore's song has very little notability. Unreal7 (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support. The CS song hit the weekly top ten in five countries, and has already eclipsed the other (which I personally think is the better song, but this ain't Andrewpedia). I would have preferred to wait a little longer before moving the CS song to the undisambiguated name, but since the RM has been raised, do it. Andrewa (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.