Talk:All Souls Chapel (Poland Spring, Maine)

Maine Mid‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name of site

It has been noted by Clariosophic that the name of the site listed in the National Register ("All Soul's Chapel") is probably incorrect, as it is grammatically incorrect. However it has not been established that it is a typo by the National Register staff, as a free copy of the NRHP application has not been requested or obtained. It seems to me inappropriate to go on too much about the potential/probable misspelling in the article itself, as that tends to violate wp:OR and wp:SELF depending on what is said. I suggest that the item be identified as a question to be put to the National Register, by entering it into the appropriate section (probably "Maine names") within wp:NRIS info issues if it has not been entered there already. It would help if any source showing a different spelling for the site were provided in that entry. Thanks! doncram (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]