Talk:All Quiet on the Western Front (1979 film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Watched
[edit]We watched this movie (or at least, it certainly looks more like it was the '79 version than the '30 version, what with the color and all.) in my history class a few years back - and while I don't remember all that much from the movie, I certainly don't remember a "French Superweapon that can turn Men into Monsters" as mentioned in the Summary section here. I also quite clearly remember Baumer being shot by an unseen enemy while stopping to sketch/look at? a bird on a tree only shortly before the armistice, not being overrun by french monster-men. While I don't want to just edit it in case I am horribly mistaken and thinking of something completely different, I'm pretty sure the plot summary in the article is in error. -Draewn
Incorrect weapon information
[edit]I have not seen the film in some ten years or so. However I think that the article's claim that Gew 88s were used in the film is incorrect. Being a gun geek I noticed early on that although a few actual Gew-98s do apear in the film the majority of the rifles in the movie (including oddly enough the primary actors) are actually post-war Turkish mausers. These are often used as "stand ins" for the fairly uncommon Gew-98 in WW1 movies. I do not recall seeing any model 1888 commision rifles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.219.207 (talk) 01:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
You are almost certainly correct. Another example of slackness in the making of this movie. Please amend the article accordingly. Rumiton (talk) 07:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure about the rifles...were Turkish Mausers equiped with that bayonet (the curved quillion, aka: handguard)? See the first/early part of the movie. They look like Japanese bayonets to me. There were indeed a lot of Arisaka rifles sent to Britain and other countries in WWI; most used in training, but still...were they perhaps used as 'movie surplus' in this case? Engr105th (talk) 10:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- (removed nasty personal comment which violated civility. Editor is welcome to repost after rethinking and rephrasing.) Rumiton (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Films made in the Communist Bloc
[edit]It is certainly wrong to state that this was one of the first films made in the Communist bloc - I can think of two from the 60s offhand, namely, "Kelly's Heroes" and "The Bridge at Remagen" (Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia resp.) The latter had a near-comical real life interruption in the production schedule when Russia invaded, forcing the entire production crew to flee into Germany in a strange recapitulation of reality. There must be many more examples of war films that used these countries for their relatively unspoiled village scenes and matching terrain. Antimatter33 (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
(: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.190.77 (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Banned in Germany?
[edit]I was under the impression that this movie was banned in Germany? Or am I mistaken? Delierajaytoday (talk) 02:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- The original movie that came out in 1930 was banned in Germany from 1930 until 1945. This 1979 version was never banned. Rumiton (talk) 08:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class war films articles
- War films task force articles
- C-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class war films articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class Anti-war articles
- Low-importance Anti-war articles