Jump to content

Talk:All-India Muslim League/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 04:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I will take this review. Please use a  Done template or some other means of indicating when a issue has been resolved. I can see you have not made any edits to this page and just want to inform you that this is not standard for a GA nominator.

Copy-vios

[edit]
  • It was formally proposed by Nawab Salimullah Khan and supported by Hakim Ajmal Khan, Maulana Muhammad Ali Jauhar, Zafar Ali Khan, Syed Nabiullah, a barrister from Lucknow, and Syed Zahur Ahmad, an eminent lawyer, as well as several others.
  • Earwing only flagged quotes otherwise, I will do more checks as this review gets going

Citations

[edit]
  • lang, 23, 24 & 25 March 2003; Also see, Mahmood, Safdar (2004). Iqbal, Jinnah aur Pakistan (in Urdu). Lahore: Khazina Ilm-wa-Adab. pp. 52–69. full citation needed tag
  • There are multiple citation need tags and a handful of other places were there are citations missing.


I am willing to entertain this review but the citation issue needs to be cleaned up before I engage with this any further. In further nominations, please make sure everything is cited with WP:RELIABLE, WP:SECONDARY sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article criteria. Putting on hold, this is quick-fail criteria and I will fail the page within the 7 day limit unless this is resolved quickly. Please ping me if you have any questions. Etrius ( Us) 04:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Flamealpha123 has been active during this time but has not responded to my concerns. I confirmed that there was a notice on their talk page and was clear that the page would fail within the 7 day time frame due to quickfail criteria. Failing at this time. Etrius ( Us) 19:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.