Talk:Alkali metal halide

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just thought I'd mention I reverted the page to a previous version after vandalism by 85.12.72.204 (I used another IP as I lost my username).

--Couldntgetadecentname (talk) 14:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The higher the number is, the more ionic the solid is."

Surely this would be offset by Cs⁺ being far more polarisable than Li⁺. Double sharp (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrides

Should the alkali metal hydrides be included in this article? Joe Avins (talk) 23:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that they are different enough. Do they have their own article? Gah4 (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

properties such as lattice constant

There is a comment in the article about the electronegativity table, and that there is no table for other physical properties. Would it be useful to add here a table of, for example, lattice constant for all alkali halides? They are in the individual articles, but not all together in one place. Gah4 (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Organic chemistry

V 2402:8100:2050:1E88:D47F:3942:A5CE:95C2 (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]