Talk:Alice Springs Orogeny
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alice Springs Orogeny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possible copyvio removed
[edit]An ip editor (using 3 different ip addresses) has replaced the content with material that appears to have been copied from other sources. The last used ip is registered to McGill University. Google search suggests part was copied from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, B12405, 23 PP., 2009 doi:10.1029/2008JB006194 however I can't access the article to verify it. I've reverted because of apparent copyvio problems and the removal of references. Vsmith (talk) 01:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- The anon has again rewritten the article, but now is using references, progress. Vsmith (talk) 00:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Mountain articles
- Mid-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- Stub-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Stub-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Northern Territory articles
- Low-importance Northern Territory articles
- WikiProject Northern Territory articles
- WikiProject Australia articles