This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
This came up at WP:PNT and I was asked to look into it. THe references are there but essentially to her own works in admittedly learned journals and reliable but WP:PRIMARYSOURCE, as she is the author of those references. Now if you take them away what you are left with is failing the WP:BLP criterion of having at least one reliable secondary source i.e. WP:RS.
There is no indication of notability, so what, she is a PhD, I have more letters after my name than in it (but then I have a very short name). I have been published in more esteemed journals than this woman, and I don't have a bio, quite rightly, because in Wikipedia terms I am not notable. My name is not dropped in software engineering circles, people do not swoon as I pass, I am equally non notable and this is an attempt, I think, to make a non notable person notable. Not sure this was self created but the signs all point to it. The reason this came up at WP:PNT is that it was originally inserted into English Wikpedia in Spanish or Portuguese not sure which and so I got a tell-tale from one of the regulars at PNT whose username is half Kanji but you can look over there if you disbelieve me. UserInkobe or something but it is a bugger for me to type cos it is Kanji at the back end. Si Trew (talk) 03:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Simon, as you've probably noticed your nomination for speedy deletion was rejected. In this case, I think the only option is taking it to WP:AFD. From what I have observed in the past, if Ms. Sanchez is a notable academic then the AFD regulars will find the sources and improve the article. If not, it will be deleted in due course. The guy with the difficult name, AKA AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
