Jump to content

Talk:Alibunar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I do not object to have here alternative names for villages in minority languages if that ethnic group is majority in that village. However, I am not sure that these alternative names are written for proper villages. Here is the detailed ethnic map of Vojvodina from Serbian Wikipedia:

It would be correct that village Nikolinci have Romanian majority, as well as that village Janošik have Slovak majority. However, according to this map, village Vladimirovac have Serb ethnic majority, while Seleuš is ethnically mixed (The map do not show who is the relative majority there). Another village with Romanian majority could be Lokve. PANONIAN (talk) 03:51, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Comment: You are correct about Lokve (the locality name was in the meantime officially changed to Sânmihai) there is a definite Romanian majority. However, the names mentioned are not only reflections on other languages widely spoken in that region, but are names of those localities still used by the inhabitants, and in most cases are historic names from the Austro-Hungarian Empire times. These alternative (old) locality names are viewed by the natives as more valid than names changed post-WWII. gaston200 (talk) 13:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alibunar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alibunar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]