Jump to content

Talk:Ali Gomaa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Problems with Section on Egyptian Revolution

[edit]

The section of the Mufti's views on the Egyptian Revolution seems just to be making excuses rather than presenting accurate information. For example the article states ,"As a scholar, Dr. Ali, never speaks out of personal opinion, but rather enacts his formidable intellect of Ijtihad, based on the Islamic Shariah, with wise consideration to the prevalent state of affairs and bearing in mind the well-being of the Ummah and what establishes the Islamic Law as ordained in the main sources of Shariah."

This seems to be assuming that there was no other legitimate view point. This is further supported by the fact that when I added the part about Tariq Ramadan's criticism of his reaction it was removed. In short I think this section needs an NPOV makeover.

Yster76 User Talk: Yster76 11:40 , 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The section is an opinion piece and needs to be significantly revised and reduced. A simple mention of Goma'as initial stance, his revised opinion and the criticism leveled at him should suffice. As is, the entire section should be removed.

The maulana (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that section should be deleted entirely. It doesn't add anything encyclopedic to the entry, and makes no citations whatsoever. I wonder where on earth it's from! If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and delete it. Aminul802 (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AliGHouse (talk) 19:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made a change to it and cited it with evidence and that too was deleted. This section needs to be removed completely!

Unless someone is willing to neutralize the information and cite sources, I agree.

Yster76 (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. In retrospect my revert was inappropriate. I based my revert off of user with a name very similar to the article removing a huge amount of text without an edit summary. I thought the edit I saw was blanking so I reverted without spending enough time to look at the revisions. I support removing the biased paragraphs. Ross Hill (talk) 00:38, 20 Nov 2013 (UTC) 00:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ross Hill is talking about this revert of AliGHouse's edit --BoogaLouie (talk) 01:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Ali Gomaa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ali_Gomaa&oldid=1205622778"