Jump to content

Talk:Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

I question the notability of this article. I do not feel that every detainee of the United States needs his or her own wikipedia page. Furthermore, the references in the article are all primary sources, which contribute to, but do not establish notability according to wikipedia guidelines. Deputydog23 (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain how you reached the conclusion the Seton Hall study this article cites is a "primary source"?
  • Mark Denbeaux, Joshua Denbeaux, David Gratz, John Gregorek, Matthew Darby, Shana Edwards, Shane Hartman, Daniel Mann, Megan Sassaman and Helen Skinner. "No-hearing hearings" (PDF). Seton Hall University School of Law. p. 17. Retrieved 2007-04-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
I recently posed a couple of questions, over on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, asking for opinions about whether the "Summary of Evidence" memos are not really "secondary sources". Short version -- the memos summarize multiple documents, from multiple agencies -- a canonical example of a "secondary source". I would appreciate it if you would go take a look there. If you still think they are "primary sources", I would really appreciate you leaving your explanation for this conclusion.
Regarding whether Guantanamo captives merit coverage here -- how do you know your feeling that they do not hasn't lead you to offer an instance of WP:IDONTLIKEIT?
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "MiamiHerald2015-11-16":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]