Talk:Alexander Marinesko

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Russia: History / Military High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Soviet Union High‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Older talk

The Russian version disagrees with the English version here. The Russian article says that Hitler did not call Marinesku, claims only 5300 people died, and that Marinesku was praised for the attack. The Russian article also does not talk about the controversial nature of the sinking, nor the non-military people on board. -- IlyaHaykinson 23:55, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some things are fixed. Even rus artcl says military was only about 1,300. mikka (t) 21:50, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Old talk

I've removed: Alexander Marinescu (romanian transcription, as he was romanian ethnically) - added by anonymous user. Russian sources say he was Ukrainian, so we need a confirmation if he was Romanian ethnically. Besides, he was not called Marinescu, but Marinesko, even if it is true. Pibwl ←« 19:59, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently reading Crabwalk by Gunter Grass, which states that his father was Romanian (by which, I guess, is meant "from Romania", and not Moldovan, Bessarabian, etc.). The "-sco" ending is a frequent trasliteration of the "-scu" one, and it was common habit at the time for a Romanian to transliterate his or her name when using it among foreigners (see Eugene Ionesco, Helene Vacaresco etc) - his father may have opted to do so himself, or authorities might have changed it for him (Grass -or rather, Grass' first person narrator- claims the latter happened, but that is just an opinon). The issue of Ukrainian in Russian sources refers to any or all of these: his Ukrainin mother, the fact that he was born in Odessa, the hostility between Romanians and Soviets, the issue of Moldovans/Romanians. I suggest inclusion in Category:People of Romanian descent pending the creation of more definite ones (if the latter is indeed possible, given the Moldovan issue in between Romanians and cats for "Romanian Russians", "Romanian Ukrainians", "Romanian Soviet citizens"...). Dahn 18:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4,500 victims of Steuben

Dampfschiff General von Steuben

Xx236 15:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster

This page is an absolute mess. Without additional sources on him it's REALLY hard to justify the very negative tone and allegations made by this article. If he's really as much of a shmuck as the article implies, fine, but we need sources to back it up. TallNapoleon (talk) 08:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Schmuck?! The article's implications seem to be more along the lines that he was an incompetent drunken bullshitter. Either way, more proof is needed to back up this assertion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.16.208.177 (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV mess

This is article is about a simple captain of a submarine who happened to sink a huge ship carrying mostly civilians. This should be fairly uncontroversial, this was war, he did not have any idea what he is sinking etc etc etc. There is nor reason for sentences like "supporters of Marinesco claim" and similar nonsense and wikipedia consensus is not required to retroactively approve the sinking of ships that happened during WWII. Richiez (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is still a very poor example. Lots of POV words from two different points of view. I wouldn't put much trust in a single word in this article. The article classifies opinions as "far-right" or "generally accepted". Its very poorly sourced. Bad article. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source and objectivity

Most of this article is a direct translation from the Russian language Wikipedia entry with some selective editing. The Russian language article has source documents listed but is not footnoted to indicate which sources provide what information and many are German sources. Clearly, German sources have a bias regarding the Wilhelm Gustloff. The only likely objective treatment is to provide the view from both sides of the story.Федоров (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The German article about the Wilhelm Gustloff looked ok the last time I looked so there should be not much bias regarding the sinking. Do you suspect that something is likely to be incorrect about the other biographic information, like alcohol and other issues? Richiez (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see this article still lacks reliable sources so I will pretty soon trim it down to the facts which I remember as beeing completely uncontroversial. IOW last call to add sources before it will be stubbed. Richiez (talk) 11:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please state objections to specific claims. please remember in wikipedia the policy is verifiability, not "cite every word". - Altenmann >t 03:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2015 edits

Hi, I would like to copy-edit this page to address some of the current issues.

Some of the proposed changes:

(1) Reduce the level of personal details overall.

(2) Modify the sentence in the lead as follows

"...the captain of the S-13 submarine, which sank the German ship Wilhelm Gustloff, with recent research showing that over 9,000 died (almost 5000 of whom were children[1]) when the ship sank, most of whom were civilians fleeing the advance of the Red Army."

to: "...the captain of the S-13 submarine, which sank the German military transport ship Wilhelm Gustloff. By one estimate,[3] 9,400 people died, which makes it the largest loss of life in a single ship sinking in history. (Using language from MV Wilhelm Gustloff article).

(3) Sources are needed here:

"Because of the long inactivity, the level of battle training of the crew was low. Marinesko began to find consolation in alcohol, and he was expelled as a candidate member of the Communist Party."
Then Marinesko exposed his submarine to real risk by prematurely returning without any warning to his base. Soviet patrol boats attacked M-96, and a tragedy was avoided by sheer luck.
Although only half of the unit returned, without the machine...
Of the 13 units of the Type S (Stalinets), Series IX and IXbis, only this boat survived the war. (and how is this relevant in this article?)
After spending New Year's night 1945 in Hanko with a Swedish woman, the owner of a restaurant, Marinesko disappeared for several days. It was proposed that he be court-martialed as a deserter, and this could be fatal for him.

(4) I don't see the term "disaster" applicable in this context, as the sinking was that of legitimate military target, and, while loss of life is tragic, the "worst maritime disaster" does not apply.

From Legal-dictionary:
Shipwreck (redirected from Maritime Disaster)
SHIPWRECK. The loss of a vessel at sea, either by being swallowed up by the waves, by running against another vessel or thing at sea, or on the coast.

Etc

Any comments, suggestions or concerns before I proceed? I will begin by adding ^{[citation needed]} tags. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]