Jump to content

Talk:Alexander Cameron Rutherford/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 16:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • In the The move west section, the last sentence says "and also owned and interest gold mining equipment situated on the North Saskatchewan River." This doesn't make grammatical sense...
    • Early political career section, third paragraph, "on a similar platform of independent support for Haultain has he had adopted in 1898"
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Ref #117 (Territories) needs an access date.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • The photo of John R. Boyle is lacking author information.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall a very nice article. I have a couple of comments on prose and one comment each on references and images, so I am placing this review on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    All excellent points that I should have caught myself. Now fixed. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Allright, everything looks great, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Very nice work and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]