Talk:Aldoxorubicin

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because...these are sourced references only to refer to do further research. As references they are merely means of additional studies to follow up with and for readers to continue to further their research with scientific studies listed as references. (your reason here) --Medic4Life (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The references aren't the problem, the problem is that it's a direct copy of [1], which violates copyright laws. You need to write the page in your own words. If you don't, Wikipedia is obliged to delete it as a copyright violation. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should move aldoxorubicin section from CytRx to this article

-- Rod57 (talk) 12:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting claim re: aldoxorubicin and doxorubicin

I have deleted the following due to a lack of in-line citations:

"Completed preclinical and clinical trials indicate that this agent may have attributes that improve upon native doxorubicin, including reduction of adverse events, improvement in efficacy, and the ability to reach the tumor more quickly."

For the revision in question, please see: Old revision of Aldoxorubicin. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 02:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]