Talk:Alder Lake (disambiguation)

On 4 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Alder Lake. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 4 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus after extended discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Now Alder Lake is reserved to a Intel Processor, that before, until today, 4/4/2022, had the title Alder Lake_(microprocessor), but there are also two lakes Alder Lake (Washington) and Alder Lake (New York). I can't see a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. No one link to Alder Lake Special:WhatLinksHere/Alder_Lake, only redirect mainly from Alder Lake (microprocessor), a few from Alder Lake (microarchitecture) and some others. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 20:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisted after formatting correction. 08:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. It may be also noted that the lowercase Alder lake continues redirecting to the Alder Lake (disambiguation) page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Highly unlikely that there can be a primary topic among such obscure topics. BD2412 T 02:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
support per WP:NOPRIMARY—blindlynx 14:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per nom. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment added draft move to microprocessor dab per convention to request all moves explicitly, feel free to suggest something else. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 06:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 14:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm puzzled by claims of the move request and many comments. A primary topic is very obvious here imo - Alder Lake (microprocessor) has constant nearly 2000 page views each day, while both nature locations have page views in single digit. Regarding in Google search counts, "Alder Lake Intel" results in 20M search results, 220K news articles, while nature locations have 5M search results and bit more than 10K news articles. And about links in, obviously since it's a newly moved page, most pages still redirect to the processor's old page, while the nature locations have single digit articles linked in for the past few years. Reading WP:Disambiguation several times and I find it hard to support a noprimary disambiguation page. R^* 17:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Compare Apple, Amazon, and Android. Limiting our consideration to currently in vogue tech uses invites WP:RECENTISM. BD2412 T 20:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - While I see your point, that doesn't discount the microprocessor being a primary topic for the name. Articles about 10+ years old Intel microprocessor, like Sandy Bridge, still have three digit page views each day, magnitudes more than respective nature locations. The microprocessor also has more than 110 linked pages, from a variety of tech articles (From Intel roadmap to computer products), and more than nature locations with single digit articles linked in. And obviously the microprocessor is a world wide interest for readers, comparing to the nature locations which are probably not known outside the states, not mentioning outside US. R^* 03:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with R^*. Agnerf (talk) 08:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Even 40-year-old Intel processors still receive hundreds of daily pageviews (example), so the recentism complaints are off the mark. This article has a popularity lead of two orders of magnitude, with no indication this will ever change, and I don't believe anyone would make the argument that the two obscure American reservoirs have great enough educational value to override all that. – Uanfala (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oppose. Agree with Uanfala 176.23.80.150 (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]