Talk:Alcalde and Fay

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have marked the article for proposed deletion because the firm on its own is not notable. It is but a footnote in a different article. A footnote which in the end doesn't bear any relevance as the other article would stand just as well if the firm was not mentioned. This particular article can also be seen as an attempt at self-promotion in the any publicity is good publicity vein. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont agree. The firm itself is not insignificant. It has access to high office and elementary knowlege on wikipedia should be available. I suggest keeping it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.97.83 (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was fascinated to learn more about the firm now that it has come to light in the McCain campaign. I was rather hoping it was linked into a directory of Washington lobbyist firms so that I could read up on each one of them. Lobby firms wield much power for their size, and this sway makes each one significant. Wmjuntunen (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree either. I think we need an objective bio of the Firm Nolawip

I also concur that this article stub must REMAIN and be expanded. We want to know exactly what kind of lobbying goes on, who does it, and if the allegations are true against Mr McCain what the lobbying may desire to get out of him. Even withouth the McCain story, lobby info with members and activities are important and worthy of a encyclopedic entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassan kachal (talk • contribs) 00:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is to remain than it needs to be written up properly in an unbiased way and with the current controversy in a subsection. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]