Jump to content

Talk:Album covers of Blue Note Records

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleAlbum covers of Blue Note Records is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article will appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 13, 2024.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
July 5, 2024Good article nomineeListed
August 7, 2024Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 11, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the album covers of Blue Note Records have been considered to be the "look" of jazz?
Current status: Featured article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Including two disagreeing sources for ALT1 because there seems to be no consensus on how many covers Miles designed, other that they are in the multiple hundreds. I am personally more drawn to ALT1 than I am the original hook, given that the original cannot be supplemented by free-use images. Feel free to alter the hooks as well.
Created by Joeyquism (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Joeyquism (talk) 05:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Hi Joey! came here after finding this article from discord. Sources look good, with reliable sources and authors with good creds. Spotchecked a few of them (refer to Special:PermanentLink/1229691544), [3] [13], [33], [69] and found no issues with plagiarism or verifiability (although I would tone down with the quotations if you want to bring it to GA). No need for a QPQ. Wrt hookiness, I don't really vibe with both hooks - the second is wordy, and the first depends on whether people know Andy Warhol. Perhaps you can spin a hook from the third paragraph of the lead? PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 01:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PSA - thank you for the review! I agree with your point that ALT0 requires prior knowledge, though I'm not sure that I agree ALT1 is wordy other than the usage of the word "jazz" twice. As a replacement, how about the following:
Perhaps that's more concise? I also took your suggestion of spinning a hook from the third paragraph:
...or some other variation? Let me know what you think. For your point regarding quotations, I am assuming you mean the quotations in the reception section, but please correct me if I'm wrong. I'll get to reducing the quotation usage as soon as I can. Thanks again! joeyquism (talk) 02:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free overuse

[edit]

With 17 non-free album covers as of the time of writing, the article seems to violate the "minimal usage" criterion of the Wikipedia:Non-free content guidelines, which states that A single item of non-free content that conveys multiple points of significant understanding within a topic is preferred to multiple non-free items which each convey fewer such points. I think the article is written well enough that viewers can get the gist with one or two images per section, including the lede. (Pinging User:Joeyquism) DigitalIceAge (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I’ll get to editing this when I get home tonight. joeyquism (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reduced the number to 7 images. Let me know if this is enough to warrant the removal of the minimal use violation template. joeyquism (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Much better, thank you! DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]